https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/nsc-663284.ht
Of the 3723 women included, a total of 181 (4.9%) developed GDM. The c-statistics of the prognostic models were higher, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 without glucose and from 0.78 to 0.80 with glucose, compared with the single risk factor approach (0.72). Models showed adequate calibration, and yielded a higher net benefit than the single risk factor approach for most threshold probabilities. Teede 2011 performed best in the reclassification analysis. First-trimester prognostic models seem to outperform the currently used single risk fac
Like
Comment
Share
