https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ms-275.html
0 D or worse, and among 3607 eyes with non-cycloplegic SER -0.5 D or worse (e.g., met myopia definition), 62.1% eyes had cycloplegic SER -0.5 D or worse. Cycloplegic SER was more correlated with axial length than non-cycloplegic SER (Pearson r =0.82 vs. 0.72, .0001). In multivariable analysis, larger SER differences were associated with more hyperopic refractive error and smaller axial length (all .0001). Non-cycloplegic refractive error overestimates myopia by approximately one diopter. This overestimation increases with more hy
Like
Comment
Share
