https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/direct-red-80
8%, β = -0.287, p = 0.05) and boys (R2 = 17%, β = -0.406, p less then 0.0005). Fatness was not associated with the CVDrs in both sexes. After controlling for all the variables in the model, only fitness (R2 = 10.4%) and abdominal fat (R2 = 19.5%) were associated with CVDrs respectively. Unfit girls were 3.2 (95% CI = 1.31-7.91, p = 0.011) times likely to develop CVD risk abnormality compared to their fit counterparts. The likelihood of unfit boys developing CVD risk abnormality was 3.9 (95% CI = 1.15-10.08, p = 0.005) times compar
Like
Comment
Share
