https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/ldn193189.htm
282 mm and paste was 0.241 mm respectively. Gingival height with the paste was 0.047 mm lower than that achieved by the cord (P = .208). Conclusions Cord and paste retraction produced comparable clinically acceptable gingival gaps, with the cord producing statistically larger gap size. Clinical significance The cord and paste retraction materials produced comparable clinically acceptable gingival retraction.Class III malocclusion is a common dentofacial deformity. The underlying genetic alteration is largely unclear. In this study, we
Like
Comment
Share
