https://www.selleckchem.com/products/bgb-290.html
222). For pairs of natural premolar, molar and posterior teeth, reductions of 15.4 %, 22.8 % and 11.5 %, respectively, in PR for nutritional risk were observed (p  0.05). The presence of at least two pairs of natural molars or three pairs of natural posterior teeth was significantly associated with nutritional risk (p  0.05). Older adults with fewer teeth or pairs of natural teeth, especially posterior teeth, presented poorer nutritional status. Demonstrating threshold correlation between natural teeth and nutrition, data showed