https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/cyclo-rgdyk.h
The constant comparative method guided analysis. RESULTS Thirty patients and PCPs participated. Among facilitators were the tool's potential to increase screening uptake, reduce patient risk, improve resource allocation, and facilitate discussion about CRC screening. PCP-identified barriers included concerns about the tool's accuracy, consistency with guidelines, and time constraints. CONCLUSIONS Patients and PCPs found the risk prediction tool useful, with potential to increase uptake, safety, and efficiency of CRC screening, indic
Like
Comment
Share
