https://www.selleckchem.com/pe....ptide/gp91ds-tat.htm
Results GV of RGCL thickness differed significantly between pre-OAG (p 0.05) and controls, respectively. Qualitative ROC analysis of QTV showed AUCs of 0.908 (NTG) 0.914 (POAG), 0.930 (SOAG), 0.734 (pre-POAG), and 0.519 (OHT). Implementation of eQTV yielded even higher AUCs for NTG (0.919), POAG (0.969), and SOAG (0.973) compared to GV. Similar AUCs of eQTV and GV were observed for OHT (0.514) and pre-OAG (0.77. Conclusion The results of the present study showed that quantitative and qualitative analysis of RGCL thickness yielded si
Like
Comment
Share
