https://www.selleckchem.com/products/inf195.html
2%, 7.4%, and 8.1% for TIZ; 80.8%, 8.3%, and 10.8% for SG/TIZ; and 55%, 15.6%, and 29.4% for SG. The RPE-based data were 70.9%, 19.9%, and 9.2% for RPE/TIZ% and 41.2%, 48.9%, and 9.7% for the session rating of perceived exertion. No differences were observed between the coach's and the swimmers' session ratings of perceived exertion in the 3 zones (Z1 P = .663, ES = -0.187; Z2 P = .110, ES = 0.578; Z3 P = .149, ES = 0.42. Using RPE-based TID methods, Z2 was significantly larger compared with Z1. These results show that RPE-based TID me
Like
Comment
Share
