https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/nvp-dky709.ht
051); however, FEIA specificity was higher (seven studies, n = 12,311, FEIA 93.6% [95% CI 89.9%, 96.0%] vs. IIF 180 72.4% [95% CI 62.2%, 80.7%]; p less then 0.001; seven studies, n = 3251, FEIA 93.5% [95% CI 91.1%, 95.3%] vs. IIF 1160 81.1% [95% CI 73.4%, 86.9%]; p less then 0.0001). CLIA sensitivity was similar to IIF (18 with higher specificity (four studies, n = 1981 sensitivity 85.9% [95% CI 64.7%, 95.3%]; p = 0.86; specificity 86.1% [95% CI 78.3%, 91.4%]). More data are needed to make firm inferences for CLIA vs. IIF given
Like
Comment
Share
