5 week ago - Translate

https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/bms-927711.ht
035 m3 stream bank material, which equates to 0.067 m3 m-2 - 0.092 m3 m-2 of stream bank area (between 27% and 41% in the less then 2 mm fraction) over the study period from sites with 130 to 1154 discrete cattle access hits. Multiple linear regression showed that the observed geomorphic volume loss could not be explained by natural processes alone (hydrometeorology), but was more significantly related to cattle-access frequency as the principal driver. The geomorphic volume loss had the potential to impact 29 m2 to 197 m2 of stream