https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/PCI-24781.htm
0, SD 70.7) than the LVMR group (mean 160.6, SD 58.9; p=0.004). In the subscales of pelvic organ prolapse (POPDI-6) (mean 23.2, SD 24.3 vs mean 52.4, SD 22.4; p=0.001) and the colorectal-anal distress inventory (CRADI-8) (mean 38.4, SD 23.3 vs mean 58.6, SD 25.4; p=0.009), the patients in the RVMR group had significantly better outcomes. Conclusion After VMR, the corrected anatomy was preserved. There were no clinically significant differences in anatomical results between the RVMR and LVMR procedures 5 years after surgery based on MR
Like
Comment
Share
