https://www.selleckchem.com/products/GDC-0449.html
01). Both 2D and 3D AUC increased with arbor thickness. The discrepancy in AUC between the two methods depended on mean AUC (with every 1 unit increase in mean AUC resulting in a discrepancy of 0.1 unit), but not arbor thickness. In RGCs imaged in vitro, there is a difference in AUC and PNI derived with 2D and 3D Sholl analysis. Where possible, 3D Sholl analysis of RGCs should be performed for more accurate quantitative analysis of dendritic structure. In RGCs imaged in vitro, there is a difference in AUC and PNI derived with 2D and 3D
Like
Comment
Share
