https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/otub2-in-1.ht
2 cm3, 95% confidence interval 5.2 to 65.2 cm3) smaller in volume than the muscles on the non-paretic side, and 16% (36.9 cm3, 95% confidence interval 3.1 to 70.6 cm3) smaller than in control participants. No statistically significant differences between paretic, non-paretic and control muscles were detected for fascicle length, pennation angle, physiological cross-sectional area or curvature. CONCLUSIONS People with hemiparetic stroke and reduced range of motion have, on average, a smaller medial gastrocnemius muscle on the paretic
Like
Comment
Share
