https://www.selleckchem.com/products/SB590885.html
= 0.597, s.e. = 0.096, p 0.001; higher weight, est. = 0.495, s.e. = 0.83, p 0.001), but not at follow-up. There were no differences in the EDE Global Score or most secondary outcome measures at any time-point. Several baseline variables emerged as potential treatment effect moderators at EOT. Choosing between FBT and CBT-E resulted in older and less well participants opting for CBT-E. Results underscore the efficiency of FBT to facilitate weight gain among underweight adolescents. FBT and CBT-E achieved similar outcomes in ot
Like
Comment
Share
