https://www.selleckchem.com/products/GDC-0449.html
001), Oxford Hip Score (22 vs 27, P= .019), less thigh pain (4% vs 39%, P .001), and fewer nonoperated complications (9% vs 15%). The second-generation stem had significantly better survival and clinical outcomes than the first-generation stem. The differences in survival and clinical outcomes could be attributed to the larger coated surface of the G2 stem and to the fact that the G1 stem was originally intended as a temporary implant to be followed by de-escalation. The second-generation stem had significantly better survival and
Like
Comment
Share