https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/3-aminobenzam
ved significantly higher anastomotic ulcer and stricture rates for RYGB versus SG (7.2% and 5.9 versus 0% and 0%; P .01 and P .01, respectively). RYGB had a higher rate for gastrointestinal obstruction requiring intervention (2.2% versus .4%; P = .07). A similar de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease rate was noted in both procedures (3.7% versus 3.7%; P = .98). No leaks were reported in either group. Both SG and RYGB are effective weight loss procedures for patients aged ≥65 years. RYGB seems to have higher %EBMIL a
Like
Comment
Share
