https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/selonsertib-g
than in Experiment B. As a result, the mice in Experiment A probably oxidized more AA, resulting in greater Δ15 NConsumer-Diet values. However, the similar responses of Δ15 NT-S and of TDFT-S to diet variation suggest that if diet samples are available, Δ15 NT-S accurately tracks trophic position. If diet samples are not available, the patterns presented here provide a basis to interpret Δ15 NT-S values. The trophic-source offset of Pro-Lys did not vary across diets, and therefore may be more reliable for omnivores than othe
Like
Comment
Share
