https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/caerulein.htm
PP mesh placement preserved spermatogenesis and did not alter the vas deferens or the testicle. In the ductus deferens, there was reduced luminal area (30 days), increased wall thickness (90 days), and increased type III collagen and cell proliferation (30 and 90 days) (p less then 0.05). In the testicle, cell proliferation was greater in the Mesh-DD (p less then 0.05). CONCLUSIONS PP mesh, whether or not in direct contact with spermatic funicular structures, induces changes that were not sufficient to cause damage to the evaluate