https://www.selleckchem.com/products/gdc-1971.html
2 versus 3.5, P = .001), "training tool for pediatric surgery" (mean 4.4 versus 3.9, P = .005), and "appealing take-home simulator" (mean 4.6 versus 4.0, P = .002). Conclusion The simulators tested in this study were both regarded an appealing take-home simulator. The LaparoscopyBoxx scored significantly better than the EoSim, even though this is a low budget simulator without tracking capabilities.Background In 2006, the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) utilized a modified Delphi approach to define 15 specific priority research questi
Like
Comment
Share
