https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/Cyclopamine.h
MP-RARP in subjective scores 4.0±0.8 vs. 4.4±0.9, p=0.046; SP-RARP vs. MP-RARP in pathologic score of 5, 35.5% vs. 64.5%, p=0.049; score of 4, 41.9% vs. 19.4%, p=0.038; score of 3, 19.4% vs. 9.7%, p=0.398; score of 2, 3.2% vs. 0.0%, p=0.365; and score of 1, 3.2% vs. 3.2%, p=0.932, respectively). SP-RARP showed lower nerve sparing scores than MP-RARP, the present study suggests that SP-RARP is safe and feasible with comparable short-term functional outcomes as those of MP-RARP. SP-RARP showed lower nerve sparing scores than MP-RARP,
Like
Comment
Share
