https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/bgj398-nvp-bg
9% vs 8.2% P0.001), while the rate was similar between the intermittent oral famciclovir group and the continuous oral acyclovir group (8.4% vs 7.9% P=0.835). Hepatic and renal toxicity were observed in 12% and 2.8% of the patient respectively in the intermittent famciclovir group, which was similar in the continuous acyclovir group (18.1% and 4.2%). The prophylactic use of antiviral agents is a predictive factor for varicella-zoster virus reactivation. Intermittent famciclovir prophylaxis is effective and safe in preventi
Like
Comment
Share
