https://www.selleckchem.com/pr....oducts/iclepertin.ht
In comparison with Tx, acupressure massage (AM) + Tx [-5.11; 95% confidence interval (CI), -6.65 to -3.57] was the most effective intervention in improving HRQL, followed by moxibustion (Mx) + Tx (-2.86; 95% CI, -3.86 to -1.86). Moreover, in comparison with Tx, Mx + Tx (7.79; 95% CI, 2.16 to 13.42) was the most effective intervention in improving FEV1% predicted, followed by acupuncture (A) + Tx (5.79; 95% CI, 2.90 to 8.68). Conclusions Combined interventions (APSTs + Tx) are more effective than single intervention in improving both
Like
Comment
Share
